Auto-Mechanic Liens in Arizona

Kevin P. Nelson • November 21, 2024

Arizona law provides qualified protections for mechanics whom perform repairs on vehicles at the vehicle owner’s request. Those protections are provided by a common law lien, a statutory lien, and a statutory right to treat certain vehicles as abandoned. Each protection, however, is subject to limitations including those meant to protect liens on the vehicle’s title at the time of the repairs (“prior liens”).

The common law provides a garage owner with a lien on a vehicle for the value of the work performed or material furnished during the repair of the vehicle. Beck v. Hy-Tech Performance, Inc., 236 Ariz. 354, 357, ¶ 9, 340 P.3d 433, 436 (App. 2015) (citing Capson v. Superior Court of State of Ariz., In & For Maricopa Cnty., 139 Ariz. 113, 115, 677 P.2d 276, 278 (1984)). In order for the lien to arise, there must be an express or implied agreement between the vehicle owner and the garage owner regarding the performance of the repairs. Capson, 139 Ariz. at 116, 677 P.2d at 279. A dispute related to the value of the work performed or material furnished will not, absent fraud or bad faith, destroy the lien. Beck, 236 Ariz. at 357, ¶ 9, 340 P.3d at 436. However, the lien may not include any towing or storage costs. Capson, 139 Ariz. at 115, 677 P.2d at 278. The lien is also possessory, meaning that the garage owner must remain in possession of the vehicle until the charges are paid in order to maintain the lien. Fishback v. Foster, 23 Ariz. 206, 210-211, 202 P. 806, 808 (1922). The common law lien does not permit the garage owner to sell the vehicle in order to satisfy the lien. Id. at 212, 202 P. at 808.


Similarly, Arizona Revised Statute Section 33-1022.A. provides owners of a garage or repair or service stations (collectively, a “vehicle repair business”) with a statutory lien on vehicles for the value of the work performed or material furnished if the vehicle owner agrees to pay for the repairs. Arizona Revised Statute, Section 33-1022.A. The charges are limited to the value of the parts, labor, materials, supplies and storage provided. Towing charges are not part of the lien. 


Arizona Revised Statute Section 33-1023 permits the enforcement of the statutory lien by public sale, if certain requirements are met, and allows the vehicle repair business owner to use the proceeds of the sale to satisfy the statutory lien. Any remaining or excess proceeds from that sale are then to be paid to the owner. 


One question that often arises is whether the public sale may take place without the first satisfying all prior liens. The answer is that it should not. That is because the statutory lien does not impair prior liens (e.g., a lender’s lien on the vehicle’s title), unless the owners of the prior liens (e.g., the lenders) were aware of and agreed to the repairs before they began. Arizona Revised Statute, Section 33-1022.B. Allowing the proceeds of a public sale to satisfy the statutory lien without satisfying the prior liens would impair the prior liens by effectively placing the statutory lien ahead of the prior lien.   


The limitations placed on the public sale become more obvious when an attempt is made to transfer title to the vehicle after the sale. The Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicles Division, requires a vehicle repair business owner that has a written or verbal contract for repairs with the vehicle’s owner to apply for a mechanic’s lien by complying with the “Mechanics Lien Requirements” form. That form is available at https://apps.azdot.gov/files/mvd/mvd-forms-lib/48-7810.pdf. The applicant must meet the following key requirements:


  1. Provide an original or certified copy of a work repair order signed by the vehicle’s owner.

  2. Obtain a motor vehicle records search to, among other things, verify the name and address of any lienholders.

  3. Provide a lien release from all lienholders appearing on any title and lien search. For Arizona liens, the release must be signed, notarized, dated, and include the amount of the lien.

  4. Complete an Auction Sale Certificate, which requires the applicant to certify that there were no liens of record when the mechanic’s work began. That Certificate is available at:  https://apps.azdot.gov/files/mvd/mvd-forms-lib/46-8503.pdf

  5. Complete a Title and Registration Application, which requires the applicant to identify all lienholders. The form acknowledges that “Lienholder retains an ownership interest of the vehicle…until the loan is repaid”. That Application is available at: https://apps.azdot.gov/files/mvd/mvd-forms-lib/96-0236.pdf 


Collectively, the “Mechanics Lien Requirements” prohibit the transfer of title following the public sale unless and until all prior liens have been satisfied. Therefore, no public sale of a vehicle should occur to enforce the statutory lien if unsatisfied prior liens exist.


If no prior liens exist and the vehicle is left at a “repair facility operated for commercial purposes” without a written or oral agreement regarding the performance of the repairs, then the vehicle may be reported as abandoned. Arizona Revised Statute, Section 28-4840.A. Under those circumstances, title to the vehicle may be transferred pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute, Sections 28-4841 and 28-4842. The abandoned vehicle process may not be used instead of the statutory lien process.


Some vehicle repair businesses may consider selling the vehicle without disclosing the existence of, or satisfying, prior liens. Taking that action can prove to be very costly. Misrepresenting facts in order to transfer vehicle titles (e.g., stating that no prior liens of record exist when they do) will likely subject the auto mechanic to punitive damages. Currie v. Dooley, 132 Ariz. 584, 589, 647 P.2d 1182, 1187 (App. 1982) (holding that jury’s award of punitive damages against towing company was proper when towing company made misstatements in order to obtain abandoned vehicle certificate).


If you have any questions regarding auto mechanic liens, please do not hesitate to contact me at kpn@tblaw.com.

Not Legal Advice: Please contact us if you would like to discuss the facts and circumstances of your specific matter. Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this memorandum. The information contained herein may not reflect current legal developments and is provided without any knowledge as to the recipient’s location, industry, identity or specific circumstances. No recipients of this content, clients or otherwise, should act, or refrain from acting, on the basis of any content included in this memorandum without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the jurisdiction for which the recipient’s legal issue(s) involve. The application and impact of relevant laws varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and our attorneys do not seek to practice law in states, territories and foreign countries where they are not properly authorized to do so.


Gavel on a desk
By Kevin P. Nelson April 3, 2023
This feature article originally appeared in Laches Magazine in April 2023. Growing up as a shy latchkey kid about 60 miles from the Mexican border in what was then the smallish city of Tucson, Arizona, I was provided with an early opportunity to become resourceful. Being from a broken home with a single parent who worked two jobs and put herself through college with me under her wing, I also quickly found that you learn a lot if you keep your mouth shut and your eyes open and actively watch and listen to the world around you. Once I emerged from the dark tunnel that enveloped my teenage years, I began to appreciate how the attributes I gained in my youth helped me quickly seek out, adapt to, and succeed in - most of the time - new environments.
Northville, Michigan main street
By Kevin P. Nelson May 26, 2022
Tiffany & Bosco opens brick-and-mortar office in Northville, Michigan
Hacker at a computer.
By Kevin P. Nelson June 16, 2018
Like most attorneys I know, I hate answering phone calls late Friday afternoon. Will I do it? Sure. But I know before I pick up the phone that whoever is on the other side will not have an issue that is easy to fix or that can wait until Monday to be addressed. For the past two years, those late Friday phone calls have typically concerned misdirected escrow funds.
Spotlights over water.
By Kevin P. Nelson June 1, 2018
Kevin P. Nelson, Chair, Real Estate Law Section
Monument Valley, Arizona
By Kevin P. Nelson February 14, 2018
If you are considering doing business on Tribal Land or with Tribal Entities, you need to understand that the law that applies to the business deal will likely not be Arizona law. This article addresses some important issues that arise when businesses and individuals do business with Indian Tribes or Tribal Entities on Tribal Lands. First, let’s understand what the terminology means.
Signed agreement with pen
By Kevin P. Nelson March 16, 2017
When beginning a business, many co-owners prefer to spend time focusing on their common efforts rather than the risks associated with their business relationship. Some important questions are commonly (and understandably) avoided during this “honeymoon” phase. Unwillingness to focus on these issues while they are still hypothetical can leave the partnership on a shaky foundation during rough times.
Graveyard with flowers.
By Kevin P. Nelson March 16, 2017
It is well-settled under Arizona law that life insurance proceeds payable to beneficiaries, other than the deceased debtor, are exempt from claims against the deceased debtor’s estate. That rule has stood for more than sixty years and is supported by statute, A.R.S. S 20-1131(A), and the Arizona case, May v. Ellis, 208 Ariz. 229, 230-31, 92 P.3d 859, 860 (2004). In fact, in 2008, the Arizona legislature clarified the rule by confirming that life insurance proceeds are exempt from such claims regardless of whether the beneficiary is an individual or a trust.